US inflation is scorching and a number of analysts and economists predict America will face other economic woes as politicians and the Biden administration blame corporations. This prospect of rising inflation has led financial writers like Isabella Weber to believe that price controls could ease America’s economic burdens.
Biden administration blames inflation on corporate greed and monopoly behavior
America faces the worst inflation in more than four decades, and the White House believes that tougher anti-monopoly policy could remedy the situation. Additionally, a few congressional leaders want to stifle online e-commerce giants like Amazon with proposals like Senator Amy Klobuchar’s (D-Minn.) US Online Innovation and Competition Act. Senator Tom Cotton’s (R-Ark.) Platform Competition and Opportunity Act (PCOA) also seeks to reform antitrust laws.
The White House attributes the loss of purchasing power in the United States to monopolistic behavior. Last month, the White House shared data that four business entities in the meat processing industry were fueling inflation. NYU professor Marion Nestlé told the New York Times in an interview that “their goal is to control the market so that they can control the price.” Despite the opinion of the Biden administration, the North American Meat Institute says the claims are false.
Economist thinks it’s time to consider price controls
This has led to a raging debate and most recently finance author Isabella Weber published an opinion piece via the Guardian that said, “We have a powerful weapon to fight inflation: controlling inflation. price. It is time for us to think about it. Weber’s editorial says that during World War II, US economists “recommended strategic price controls.” Essentially, price controls restrict free market activity, as mandatory prices and restrictions are put in place and enforced by governments. This means that the manufacturer has no say in the price of goods and services and that the government has full control.
Weber’s ideas are not very popular and even Nobel laureate and economist Paul Krugman lambasted the concept. In a now deleted tweet, Krugman wrote: “I am not a fanatic of the free market. But it’s really stupid. However, the next day, Krugman apologized to Weber and said he deleted the tweet. Krugman noted:
Deletion, with extreme apologies, of my tweet about Isabella Weber on price control. No excuses. It’s always wrong to use that tone against anyone who is arguing in good faith, no matter how much you disagree, especially when there is so much bad faith.
Concept of price controls mocked, Harvard economist insists there is “no reason to believe that monopoly power has increased”
Another person laughed at the idea of price controls and noted: “We went from ‘inflation is temporary’ to ‘f ***, we need price control’ in the space of a quarter.” “Anyone who calls themselves an economist and also advocates price controls deserves to be mocked, humiliated and denounced,” the Twitter account dubbed Hazlitt said. tweeted. Host of the “Smart People Sh * t” podcast Dennis porter noted:
Price controls are what every government does before everything collapses.
Even Democratic economist and senior Obama administration official Larry Summers insists that strengthening antitrust laws will not help the US economy. In one storm of tweetsSummers said, “The emerging claim that antitrust laws can fight inflation reflects the ‘denial of science.’ There are many areas like transitory inflation where serious economists differ. Antitrust as an anti-inflation strategy is not one of them. Finally, the Harvard economist pointed out that monopoly behavior had not accelerated like inflation.
“There is no reason to believe that monopoly power has increased in the past year in which inflation has accelerated dramatically,” Summers tweeted.
What do you think of the rise in inflation in the United States and of the White House, which shows monopoly behavior? What do you think of the concept of price control leverage? Let us know what you think of this topic in the comments section below.
Image credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons
Warning: This article is for informational purposes only. This is not a direct offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, nor a recommendation or endorsement of any product, service or business. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or allegedly caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, good or service mentioned in this article.